Retention
Why members leave
Cancellations tend to look like a pricing problem. In our experience they usually aren't. Most members who leave fall into one of three situations, and each has a different remedy.
The three situations
Cost, injury, and motivation.
Cost
When a member cancels over price, she has rarely decided the membership is worthless. She has decided it is optional. A membership paid from a health account is not sitting in that column.
Injury
Something hurts. She freezes rather than cancels, because she intends to return. Six weeks pass. The habit is gone, the class time is gone, the people she trained beside are gone.
Motivation
Nothing goes wrong. The reason to come simply fades, and at renewal the membership no longer argues for itself. Ongoing care gives it an argument.
Cost
When the membership becomes optional.
When a member cancels over price, she has rarely decided the membership is worthless. She has decided it is optional. Optional is the first line cut when a household budget tightens.
A membership paid from a health account is not sitting in that column. The money was set aside for health before the month began, and it is not being weighed against groceries.
The rule here is narrow and worth stating plainly. The IRS default is that gym memberships and general fitness expenses are personal, non-qualified expenses; they become HSA/FSA-eligible only when a physician documents that the exercise is being prescribed to treat, mitigate, or manage a named medical condition. General wellness, prevention, or "getting in shape" does not qualify. The letter must connect a specific diagnosis to the specific expense.[1][2]
Writing that letter is clinical work. It requires a named condition with an ICD-10 diagnosis the patient actually carries — not a risk factor or lifestyle descriptor. Codes like "lack of physical exercise" (Z72.3) are not treated as standalone qualifying diagnoses; the anchoring condition must be a bona fide disease.[3] The letter must also explain how the exercise treats that condition and state a treatment duration, typically reissued each year.[3]
Common conditions that support a Letter of Medical Necessity
- Obesity (BMI ≥30, or ≥27 with comorbidity)
- Knee and other osteoarthritis
- Chronic low back pain
- Sarcopenia and lean-mass preservation during weight loss
- Type 2 diabetes
- Hypertension
- Established cardiovascular disease
Several common conditions support this well. Obesity is the clearest: at a BMI of 30 or above, or 27 with a comorbidity, structured exercise is a class 1A treatment, and the guidelines specify the prescription — at least 150 minutes a week of aerobic activity plus two to three resistance sessions.[4][5][6] That is a description of a studio membership. Knee and other osteoarthritis is the next: exercise produces measurable reductions in pain and improvements in function and walk distance, particularly in overweight and obese patients.[7] Chronic low back pain, sarcopenia and lean-mass preservation during weight loss, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and established cardiovascular disease each have exercise as a guideline-endorsed therapeutic intervention.[6][8] More than one diagnosis strengthens the letter. Obesity with knee osteoarthritis, or obesity with type 2 diabetes, gives us more than one justification and mirrors how E&M and Z-code billing is documented.[3]
We should be candid about the limit. The final call rests with the account administrator, not with us. A diagnosis-anchored letter meeting IRS Publication 502 conventions maximizes approval, but the literature does not define an administrator's exact acceptance criteria.[1][2] We will not tell your members their memberships are reimbursable. We will tell them whether they carry a condition that supports a letter, and we will write an accurate one when they do.

The cancellation you do not get back usually starts with an injury.
Injury
The cancellation you do not get back.
This is the cancellation you do not get back, and it is the reason we built this practice.
The sequence rarely varies. Something hurts. She freezes rather than cancels, because she intends to return. Six weeks pass. The habit is gone, the class time is gone, the people she trained beside are gone. Then she cancels, and she does not come back.
We think our own profession makes this worse more often than it helps. "Rest it for six weeks and come back if it still hurts" costs you a member and does very little for her.
We see her instead — usually virtually, within a few days — and answer the question your instructors actually need answered, which is what she can still do on Tuesday. Load, range, timeline, and a date to reassess. A modification rather than a prohibition. Anything that has to be done in person is coordinated through a Preferred Local Partner Clinic.
She keeps training through the episode that would otherwise have ended her membership. Your instructor gets a specific instruction rather than a vague restriction she can neither follow nor safely ignore.
Motivation
The quiet one.
The third is the quiet one. Nothing goes wrong. The reason to come simply fades, and at renewal the membership no longer argues for itself.
Ongoing care gives it an argument. The letter of medical necessity is reissued each year alongside the member's care, which means that once a year a physician sits with her and tells her, in plain terms, to keep training. Most studios have nothing that plays that role at renewal.
It also changes where she files the expense in her own mind. Not a subscription she might cancel. Part of a treatment plan.
What we will and will not claim
Honest about the evidence.
Membership is never contingent on care, and care is never contingent on membership. We do prefer our patients to have a home studio, and we would like it to be yours. Your members remain your members.
We are not going to hand you a retention figure. There is no controlled evidence that clinical integration improves fitness membership retention; what exists is qualitative and observational, drawn from large hospital-affiliated wellness centers rather than studios of your size. The three mechanisms above are clinically sound, and we believe they are right. The magnitude is unproven, and we are not going to pretend otherwise.
We would rather measure it with you. Establish your current churn as a baseline, then follow the members who become our patients against those who don't over twelve months. It costs you nothing, and the data is yours. If it works, you will hold a number no one else in this industry has.
All services are provided by a licensed physician following clinical evaluation and only where medically appropriate. Individual treatment plans and outcomes vary. This page is informational and is not medical advice.
References
Sources.
- [1]Ding D, Glied S. Health Care–Related Savings Accounts, Health Care Expenditures, and Tax Expenditures. JAMA Health Forum. 2024;5(9):e242896. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2896.
- [2]Glied S. Diminishing Returns—HSAs and Health Care Cost Control. JAMA Health Forum. 2026;7(2):e260270. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.0270.
- [3]Lobelo F, Rohm Young D, Sallis R, et al. Routine Assessment and Promotion of Physical Activity in Healthcare Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(18):e495-e522. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000559.
- [4]Nadolsky K, Garvey WT, Agarwal M, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Consensus Statement: Algorithm for the Evaluation and Treatment of Adults With Obesity/Adiposity-Based Chronic Disease - 2025 Update. Endocrine Practice. 2025;31(11):1351-1394. doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.07.017.
- [5]Verboven K, Hansen D. Critical Reappraisal of the Role and Importance of Exercise Intervention in the Treatment of Obesity in Adults. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2021;51(3):379-389. doi:10.1007/s40279-020-01392-8.
- [6]Oppert JM, Bellicha A, van Baak MA, et al. Exercise Training in the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: Synthesis of the Evidence and Recommendations From the European Association for the Study of Obesity Physical Activity Working Group. Obesity Reviews. 2021;22 Suppl 4:e13273. doi:10.1111/obr.13273.
- [7]Jurado-Castro JM, Muñoz-López M, Ledesma AS, Ranchal-Sanchez A. Effectiveness of Exercise in Patients With Overweight or Obesity Suffering From Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(17):10510. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710510.
- [8]Mesinovic J, Hurst C, Leung GKW, et al. Exercise and dietary recommendations to preserve musculoskeletal health during weight loss in adults with obesity: A practical guide. Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders. 2025;26(5):785-803. doi:10.1007/s11154-025-09968-3.
Continue reading
More of the Sports Medicine program
Hybrid Care
Statewide telehealth, with in-person work fast-tracked through partner clinics.
Injury
Keep an injured member training instead of frozen at home.
Recovery
Structured recovery between hard training blocks.
Performance
Physician-guided performance work for members who want more.
Biohacking
Labs, wearables and metabolic programs under physician oversight.
Fitness Care Plan
The documented plan that sits alongside a member's training.
